The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a very well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
This unfortunate ambiguity results in the regulation regarding murder and manslaughter to become repugnant with Every other.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines many criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
If a target is shot at point-blank array, it might still be fair to infer that the accused supposed death. However, that is just not always the case.
This guide gives precious insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of previous resort will resolve this sort of differences and, for many reasons, such appeals will often be not granted.
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Criminal cases Inside the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil regulation systems, common regulation systems Adhere to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduce courts should make decisions regular with the previous decisions of higher courts.
10. Without touching the merits of your case with the issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to get made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal website avenues. Read more
Section 489-F in the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective is always to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity with the national currency.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed on the boy’s past, they asked if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they had very little to fret about.